Comparison guide
Blueprint vs Process Communication Model
A close cousin, a different anchor
PCM is a proprietary framework built on Kahler's clinical work with Berne. It's excellent for real-time communication coaching — noticing when someone drifts into a distress pattern and switching channel.
Blueprint draws on the same Berne tradition as it lives in the public record, and pairs it with David McClelland's motivation research (nAch, nAff, nPow) and the picture-story method McClelland used to measure motive. We deliberately do not use proprietary frameworks built on top of TA by later authors — including PCM.
Why both can be useful
If you already know PCM, Blueprint will feel familiar in its bones — three ego states, six recognizable rooms, real attention to how conversation goes sideways. The differences are in the motivation layer and in the fact that Blueprint is open-access rather than certification-gated.
A note on what Blueprint isn't
Blueprint is not a clinical tool, not a diagnosis, and not a hiring instrument. It's a relational map for self-understanding and conversation.
Keep exploring
See Blueprint's uniqueness next to others
A side-by-side look at where Blueprint's six spaces overlap with — and diverge from — the frameworks you may already know.
MBTI and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator are trademarks of The Myers & Briggs Foundation. CliftonStrengths is a trademark of Gallup, Inc. DiSC, PCM, Predictive Index, and other marks are trademarks of their respective owners. Blueprint is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any of these organizations; names are used only to identify the assessments being compared.